Serving Construction clients throughout the Northwest and Alaska

Construction Law Blog - Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

Disclaimer: The content provided on this website is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. The information provided is intended for general information which may or may not reflect the most current developments. Although these materials may be prepared by legal professionals, they should not be used as a substitute for professional services. By using this website you expressly agree that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the drafter of the content of this website. If you have a question regarding a particular issue or need legal advice, please contact one of the attorneys at AHLERS & CRESSMAN, PLLC.

The opinions or viewpoints expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of AHLERS & CRESSMAN, PLLC any link to other websites are not intended to be referrals or endorsements of those sites. The links provided are maintained by the respective organizations, and they are solely responsible for the content of their own sites.

Posted By: Brett Hill | Jul 21, 2009 | Topics: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) | View Article

Recent changes in American Arbitration Association Rules

This article summarizes the recent changes to the American Arbitration Association rules regarding the fee schedule, pending construction arbitration rule changes, and continuing concerns of the AAA.

Posted By: Brett Hill | Jul 21, 2009 | Topics: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) | View Article

Fast facts regarding results in American Arbitration Association cases

Did You Know. . .

That 91% of 2007 American Arbitration Association (AAA) construction arbitration awards involving cases with only one claim were outside the mid-range of the parties' claims? This is similar to arbitral award trends in the past two decades, and debunks the myth that arbitrators "split the baby."



Posted By: Brett Hill | Oct 17, 2008 | Topics: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) | View Article

Specificity is required in arbitration demands

In Westcott Homes, LLC v. Chamness, __ Wn. App.__, 192 P.3d. 394 (September 15, 2008), the Court of Appeals addressed the issue of whether a series of emails satisfied the statutory requirements for initiating an arbitration. The Court of Appeals held that they did not.



Posted By: Brett Hill | Apr 08, 2008 | Topics: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), Damages | View Article

Court of Appeals reaffirms limited review of arbitration awards

The Division Two Court of Appeals denied an owner's request to modify an arbitration award entered in favor of a contractor.  The case demonstrates the limited review of an arbitration award that a court will perform. 



Posted By: Brett Hill | Feb 13, 2008 | Topics: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) | View Article

Court of Appeals rules that one party cannot have unilateral right to select arbitrators

This week the Washington Court of Appeals ruled that arbitration clauses that provide only one party to the agreement the sole right to select the arbitrators are unenforceable.  The clause permitted one party to select arbitrators from its own affiliated entities.  Although the case arose out of a real estate brokerage contract the court's holding would apply to construction contracts with similar language as well.  Here is a link to the case



Posted By: Brett Hill | Jan 02, 2008 | Topics: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) | View Article

State of WA D.O.C. v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.

The Division One Court of Appeals held that prejudgment interest on an arbitration award is not recoverable between when the arbitrator issues the award and when the final judgment is entered in Superior Court.



Posted By: Brett Hill | Jan 03, 2008 | Topics: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) | View Article

Legislature Adopts Uniform Arbitration Act - Effective 1/1/06

This article provides a summary of the Uniform Arbitration Act that was enacted into law on January 1, 2006.